Ophthalmological Outcomes in Patients with Susac Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: To report ophthalmological outcomes and treatment regimen in patients with Susac syndrome. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of patients with Susac syndrome treated between November 2015 and March 2023. Multimodal imaging findings, ophthalmic examination data, information on neurological and sensorineural involvement, and therapeutic regimen were reviewed. Visual acuity was recorded as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). Ophthalmological manifestations and disease severity were assessed using the previously described clinical activity score (CAS). RESULTS: Ten patients with Susac syndrome m : f = 5 : 5 were identified. The mean follow-up time was 31.2 ± 23.3 months (range 1 to 78 months). The mean age was 41.4 ± 13.8 years (range 21 to 59 years). At baseline, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 0.03 ± 0.08 logMAR. At the last follow-up, CDVA improved to 0.00 ± 0.03 logMAR (p = 0.029). Three of 20 eyes showed an improvement of 5 letters, while no loss of visual acuity was recorded during the follow-up time. Baseline CAS was 10.65 ± 12.69, and CAS at the last follow-up was 5.15 ± 5.49 (p = 0.068). Except for one patient, all were initially treated with intravenous (i. v.) steroids and subsequent oral tapering. Depending on the treatment response, cyclophosphamide (n = 4), i. v. immunoglobulins (IVIGs) (n = 4), anti-CD20 antibodies (n = 3), or plasmapheresis (n = 1) were applied. All patients under treatment for more than 1 month (n = 9) showed improvement in CAS and CDVA. CONCLUSION: Susac syndrome is a rare autoimmune vascular endotheliopathy. Treatment of Susac syndrome appears to result in improving CAS and CDVA. The majority of patients, in addition to the systemic steroids, required systemic immunosuppressive agents. Interdisciplinary communication is crucial to reduce the time to diagnosis and initiation of therapy in patients with Susac syndrome.

Risk factors for severe hearing loss in Susac syndrome: A national cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Nonreversible hearing loss (HL) is the main sequelae of Susac syndrome (SuS). We aimed to identify risk factors for HL in SuS. METHODS: The CARESS study is a prospective national cohort study that started in December 2011, including all consecutive patients with SuS referred to the French reference center. The CARESS study was designed with a follow-up including fundoscopy, audiometry, and brain magnetic resonance imaging at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after diagnosis and then annually for 5 years. The primary outcome was the occurrence at last follow-up of severe HL defined as the loss of 70 dB in at least one ear on audiometry or the need for hearing aids. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (female 66.7%, median age 37.5 [range 24.5-42.5] years) included in the clinical study were analyzed for the primary outcome. Thirty-three patients (91.7%) had cochleovestibular involvement at SuS diagnosis including HL >20 dB in at least one ear in 25 cases. At diagnosis, 32 (88.9%), 11 (30.6%), and 7 (19.4%) patients had received steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and/or immunosuppressive (IS) drugs, respectively. After a median follow-up of 51.8 [range 29.2-77.6] months, 19 patients (52.8%) experienced severe HL that occurred a median of 13 [range 1.5-29.5] months after diagnosis. Multivariable analysis showed that the odds of severe HL were lower in patients who received IS drugs at diagnosis (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.01-1.07, p = 0.058). CONCLUSIONS: Severe HL in SuS is associated with the absence of IS drugs given at diagnosis. Our findings support the systematic use of IS drugs in SuS.

Susac syndrome - A review of current knowledge and own experience.

Susac syndrome is a rare connective tissue disorder. The pathology affects the small vessels of the brain, retina, and inner ear, and therefore the main symptoms of the disease include encephalopathy, visual disturbances, and sensorineural hearing loss. The aim of this article is to review the current medical knowledge on Susac syndrome and to present our clinical experience regarding this disease entity. In the paper, we are also presenting a case of a 25-year-old patient who was diagnosed with Susac syndrome on the basis of clinical presentation and additional test results. Susac syndrome should be differentiated from multiple sclerosis and other causes of multifocal brain damage as early diagnosis and treatment play a key role in later prognosis.

Clinical characteristics and treatment approaches in patients with Susac syndrome: a scoping review of cases.

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome (SuS) is a rare disease characterized by encephalopathy, hearing impairment and visual disturbances. Immunosuppressive treatments are used based on the hypothesis that an autoimmune endotheliopathy drives the disease. However, a solid evidence-based treatment approach is lacking. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of patient characteristics, disease course and treatment patterns related to successful outcome that have been reported in literature since 2013. METHODS: Three reviewers conducted a systematic literature search in February 2022. The primary outcome was treatment used, derived from cases classified as probable or definite SuS, describing successful treatment outcome (i.e. no signs of disease activity for ≥ 1 month). Secondary outcomes were time-to-relapse and follow-up time. Published case reports and case series were included. Various clinical characteristics and treatment(s) were extracted and categorized into different phases of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 810 records was identified. 120 articles met inclusion criteria and 161 cases were extracted. Of these, 151 cases were classified as probable or definite SuS and included in the final analysis. Number of combinations of treatments used per treatment phase were: 6 empirically, 35 after confirmed diagnosis, 43 for maintenance treatment, 22 after relapse, 18 during maintenance post-relapse. Median follow-up time was 12.3 months (0.5; 120) and median time to relapse was 4 months (1; 120). CONCLUSION: This scoping review summarizes treatment approaches in patients with SuS, highlighting variability. International efforts to collect clinical, imaging and treatment data from patients with SuS in registries are needed, in order to provide less biased and long-term follow-up information on treatment response, predictors of relapse and patient outcomes. This may lead to more evidence-based therapeutic approaches.

Use of disease assessment tools to increase the value of case reports on Susac syndrome: two case reports.

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome is an immune-mediated, ischemia-producing, occlusive microvascular endotheliopathy that threatens the brain, retina, and inner ear. There is a need for disease assessment tools that can help clinicians and patients to more easily, accurately, and uniformly track the clinical course and outcome of Susac syndrome. Ideally, such tools should simultaneously facilitate the clinical care and study of Susac syndrome and improve the value of future case reports. To meet this need, two novel clinical assessment tools were developed: the Susac Symptoms Form and the Susac Disease Damage Score. The former is a comprehensive self-report form that is completed by patients/families to serially document the clinical status of a patient. The latter documents the extent of damage perceived by individual patients/families and their physicians. Both forms were initially trialed with two particularly representative and instructive patients. The results of this trial are shared in this report. CASE PRESENTATION: Patient 1 is a 21-year-old Caucasian female who presented with an acute onset of headache, paresthesias, cognitive dysfunction, and emotional lability. Patient 2 is a 14-year-old Caucasian female who presented with an acute onset of headache, cognitive dysfunction, urinary incontinence, ataxia, and personality change. Both patients fulfilled criteria for a definite diagnosis of Susac syndrome: both eventually developed brain, retinal, and inner ear involvement, and both had typical "snowball lesions" on magnetic resonance imaging. The Susac Symptoms Form documented initial improvement in both patients, was sufficiently sensitive in detecting a subsequent relapse in the second patient, and succinctly documented the long-term clinical course in both patients. The Disease Damage Score documented minimal disease damage in the first patient and more significant damage in the second. CONCLUSIONS: The Susac Symptoms Form and the Disease Damage Score are useful disease assessment tools, both for clinical care and research purposes. Their use could enhance the value of future case reports on Susac syndrome and could improve opportunities to learn from a series of such reports.

Fluorescein Angiography Findings in Susac Syndrome: A Multicenter Retrospective Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome is a vasculopathy, resulting in the classic triad of branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO), inner ear ischemia, and brain ischemia. In this retrospective chart review, we characterize fluorescein angiography (FA) findings and other ancillary studies in Susac syndrome, including the appearance of persistent disease activity and the occurrence of new subclinical disease on FA. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective case series was institutional review board-approved and included patients with the complete triad of Susac syndrome evaluated with FA, contrasted MRI of the brain, and audiometry from 2010 to 2020. The medical records were reviewed for these ancillary tests, along with demographics, symptoms, visual acuity, visual field defects, and findings on fundoscopy. Clinical relapse was defined as any objective evidence of disease activity during the follow-up period after initial induction of clinical quiescence. The main outcome measure was the sensitivity of ancillary testing, including FA, MRI, and audiometry, to detect relapse. RESULTS: Twenty of the 31 (64%) patients had the complete triad of brain, retinal, and vestibulocochlear involvement from Susac syndrome and were included. Median age at diagnosis was 43.5 years (range 21-63), and 14 (70%) were women. Hearing loss occurred in 20 (100%), encephalopathy in 13 (65%), vertigo in 15 (75%), and headaches in 19 (95%) throughout the course of follow-up. Median visual acuity at both onset and final visit was 20/20 in both eyes. Seventeen (85%) had BRAO at baseline, and 10 (50%) experienced subsequent BRAO during follow-up. FA revealed nonspecific leakage from previous arteriolar damage in 20 (100%), including in patients who were otherwise in remission. Of the 11 episodes of disease activity in which all testing modalities were performed, visual field testing/fundoscopy was abnormal in 4 (36.4%), MRI brain in 2 (18.2%), audiogram in 8 (72.7%), and FA in 9 (81.8%). CONCLUSIONS: New leakage on FA is the most sensitive marker of active disease. Persistent leakage represents previous damage, whereas new areas of leakage suggest ongoing disease activity that requires consideration of modifying immunosuppressive therapy.

Susac syndrome following COVID-19 vaccination: a case-based review.

COVID-19 vaccine circulation approval was a turning point for the coronavirus pandemic. The current approved COVID-19 vaccines, including messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-based and adenovirus vector-based vaccines, were shown to significantly reduce the disease mortality and severity, and its adverse reactions are mainly mild ones. However, few cases of autoimmune conditions, both flare-ups and new-onset, were described in association with these vaccines. Susac vasculitis (SaS) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by the clinical triad of encephalopathy, visual disturbances, and sensorineural hearing loss. Its pathogenesis is still not fully understood but is believed to be related to autoimmune processes, including autoantibodies to anti-endothelial cells and cellular immune processes that lead to microvascular damage and, consequently, micro-occlusions of the cerebral, inner ear, and retinal vessels. It has been previously described following vaccination and, most recently, few cases following coronavirus vaccines. We here describe a case of a previously healthy 49-year-old man diagnosed with SaS 5 days following the first dose of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine.

Susac Syndrome Presenting as Recurrent Strokes.

Susac syndrome (SS) is a rare clinical entity that affects primarily young women and might result in significant morbidity. The triad that leads to suspecting the disease has classically been involvement of the brain, retina and inner ear. The likely pathology of the disease is thought to be immune mediated endotheliopathy; given its clinical and, possibly, pathological remission with immunosuppressive therapy. Here we describe an uncommon recurrent stroke in a young female that unfolds to Susac syndrome at the end. We also reviewed the literature behind diagnosis and treatment. Delayed diagnosis is associated with worse morbidity and mortality, and the most important predictor of long-term prognosis in the reported cases is the time to diagnosis. Therapies tried (with variable success) include corticosteroids, IVIG, plasmapheresis, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, and rituximab. The prognosis of SS is difficult to predict given the absence of strong clinical or radiographic features to suggest better/worse prognosis at the time of initial diagnosis. Brain MRIs and hearing/vision impairment have never normalized in previously studied cohort of patients.

Susac's syndrome - the crucial role of imaging tests for proper diagnosis.

INTRODUCTION: Susac's syndrome (SS) is a rare, autoimmune-mediated endoteliopathy characterized by a clinical triad of encephalopathy, branch retinal artery occlusion, and sensorineural hearing loss. SS is also characterized by a neuroimaging triad consisting of white matter lesions, grey matter lesions, and leptomeningeal enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Considering the rarity of SS, as well as certain similarity to other, more frequent neurological diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), this syndrome is sometimes incorrectly diagnosed and treated. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to present the current state of knowledge on SS, with particular consideration for the differential diagnostics between SS and MS, using the latest available imaging techniques, such as brain MRI, optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography (OCTA) and fluorescein angiography (FA). REVIEW METHODS: The major electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar) were searched manually in order to identify the relevant studies published on SS. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE STATE OF KNOWLEDGE: Distinguishing SS from MS is a diagnostic challenge. In the majority of cases, patients with SS do not present the complete clinical or neuroimaging triad, and a delay in making the correct diagnosis exposes the patient to the occurrence of complications, resulting from the development of the underlying disease, or/and the application of improper treatment. In the case of SS the results of brain MRI and FA are essential for making the correct diagnosis as they may reveal pathognomonic changes. SUMMARY: Imaging examinations, such as brain MRI, FA, and OCT complement each other, due to which the diagnosis of SS may be simpler, irrespective of the stage of the disease.

Síndrome de Susac: la importancia de un diagnóstico precoz / Susac syndrome: The importance of an early diagnosis

Varón de 38 años que acude a urgencias con cefalea, acompañada de vómitos, bradipsiquia e inestabilidad de la marcha, por lo que ingresa en neurología para estudio. Durante el ingreso, comienza con hipoacusia bilateral y visión borrosa en el ojo izquierdo, apreciándose en la exploración oftalmológica áreas de oclusión arterial e hiperfluorescencia de la pared arterial, por lo que es diagnosticado de síndrome de Susac. Se realiza tratamiento con corticoides sistémicos, así como con rituximab, y posteriormente con inmunoglobulinas intravenosas y micofenolato de mofetilo. El paciente consigue preservar la agudeza visual y presenta como secuelas, inestabilidad de la marcha y pérdida de audición bilateral. El diagnóstico precoz del síndrome de Susac es importante, porque un retraso en el inicio del tratamiento puede dar lugar a secuelas irreversibles como sordera, ceguera o afectación neurológica (AU)

A 38-year-old man who attended the emergency department with headache, accompanied by vomiting, bradypsychia and gait instability, for which he was admitted to Neurology for study. During his admission, he began to present bilateral hearing loss and blurred vision in the left eye, with areas of arterial occlusion and hyperfluorescence of the arterial wall being observed in the ophthalmological examination. As a result, he was diagnosed with Susac syndrome. He was treated with systemic corticosteroids, as well as with rituximab and subsequently, with intravenous immunoglobulins and mycophenolate mofetil. The patient managed to preserve visual acuity, with gait instability and bilateral hearing loss as sequelae. Early diagnosis of Susac syndrome is important, because a delay in the start of treatment can lead to irreversible sequelae such as deafness, blindness or neurological involvement (AU)

Involuntary crying episodes with Susac's syndrome-a rare presentation of a rare disease: a case report.

BACKGROUND: In this case, we reported the pseudobulbar affect (PBA) in a patient with Susac's syndrome-a rare condition that was caused by a rare syndrome. Previous case reports of Susac syndrome described psychiatric symptoms such as emotional disturbances or personality changes. Only a few case reports have reported psychiatric disorders in patients with Susac's syndrome. There were no reported cases of Susac syndrome with PBA as an initial presentation. CASE PRESENTATION: Our patient was 56 years old and presented with involuntary crying, left-sided headache, left-sided hearing loss, and tinnitus. Brain MRI showed numerous areas of restricted diffusion and enhancement involving the corpus callosum, bilateral hemispheres, and brainstem. Ophthalmological evaluation showed bilateral branch retinal artery occlusion. She was diagnosed with Susac's syndrome and PBA. She was treated with cyclophosphamide and dextromethorphan hydrobromide/quinidine sulfate with excellent recovery. This is a 2-year clinical course. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Recognition of the clinical presentation of Susac's syndrome and PBA with early diagnosis and treatment are the keys to preventing further disability and impact on patients and their families.

Susac syndrome: A scoping review.

Susac syndrome is a rare disease characterized by an inflammatory microangiopathy limited to the brain, eye, and ear vessels. It mainly affects young women. Although the pathophysiology is not fully elucidated, recent advances favour a primitive vasculitis affecting the cerebral, retinal and cochlear small vessels. Diagnosis relies on the recognition of the triad including: 1/subacute encephalopathy with unusual headache and pseudo-psychiatric features associated with multifocal ischemic white matter, grey matter nuclei and specifically corpus callosum lesions along with leptomeningeal enhancement on brain MRI, 2/ophthalmological involvement that may be pauci-symptomatic, with bilateral occlusions of the branches of the central artery of the retina at fundoscopy and arterial wall hyperfluorescence on fluorescein angiography, 3/cochleo-vestibular damage with neurosensorial hearing loss predominating on low frequencies. The full triad may not be present at diagnosis but should be sought repeatedly. Relapses are frequent during an active period lasting approximately 2 years. Eventually, the disease resolves but isolated retinal arterial wall hyperfluorescence without new occlusions may recur, which should not result in treatment intensification. First-line treatment mostly consists of high dose corticosteroids. In refractory patients or in case of relapse, immunomodulatory molecules such as intravenous immunoglobulins or immunosuppressive drugs such as mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide or rituximab should be started. Sequelae -mostly hearing loss and cognitive impairment- are usually mild but remain frequent in these young patients.

Susac syndrome as a multidisciplinary diagnostic challenge.

INTRODUCTION: Susac syndrome (SuS) is a disease manifested as the clinical triad of encephalopathy, branch retinal artery occlusion, and loss of sensory neural hearing. CASE REPORT: The case is presented of a 28-year-old patient hospitalized due to visual impairment of the left eye, and whose hearing and neuropsychiatric disorders had appeared two years earlier. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated lesions located in the white matter and along the corpus callosum. An audiogram showed bilateral sensory neural hearing loss. Fluorescein angiography examination revealed branch retinal artery occlusion of the left eye. Based on the clinical picture and results of tests, the diagnosis of SuS was made. Despite the use of steroid and immunosuppression therapy the disease progressed. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis for SuS depends on the early diagnosis and implementation of treatment. It should be underlined that in case of hearing loss or encephalopathy of unknown cause, SuS should always be excluded.

Sudden onset hearing loss as initial presentation of Susac syndrome: a rare case report and brief review.

Susac syndrome is a rare disease presenting with a classic triad of symptoms. These are sensorineural hearing loss, encephalopathy, and branch retinal artery occlusions. Initial presentation is usually headache and symptoms of encephalopathy. Hearing loss is unusual in the early stages but, when it does present, can often lead to a misdiagnosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Hence, neurological and retinal examinations are essential to an accurate diagnosis. In this study, we aimed to raise awareness of Susac syndrome among physicians and facilitate recognition of its manifestation, especially in those patients presenting with hearing loss alone. Identifying Susac syndrome that presents as sudden sensorineural hearing loss can be challenging but a number of case reviews have been reported in recent years and treatment guidelines are available.

[Update on Susac syndrome]. / Actualités dans le syndrome de Susac.

Susac syndrome is a rare disease affecting mainly young women, characterized by a microangiopathy limited to the cerebral, retinal, and cochlear vessels. Although the pathophysiology of Susac syndrome is not yet fully elucidated, recent advances favour a primitive vasculitis affecting the cerebral, retinal and cochlear small vessels. Susac syndrome must be recognized in the presence of the pathognomonic clinical triad associating: 1/subacute encephalopathy with unusual headache and pseudopsychiatric features associated with diffuse white matter, grey matter nuclei and specifically corpus callosum lesions on brain MRI; 2/eye involvement that may be pauci-symptomatic, with occlusions of the branches of the central artery of the retina at fundoscopy and arterial wall hyperfluorescence on fluorescein angiography; and 3/cochleo-vestibular damage with hearing loss predominating at low frequencies on the audiogram. Relapses are frequent during an active period lasting approximately 2 years. Eventually, the disease resolves but isolated retinal arterial wall hyperfluorescence without new occlusions may recur, which should not lead to treatment intensification. First-line treatment consists of a combination of anti-aggregants and high dose corticosteroids. In refractory patients or in case of relapse, immunomodulatory molecules such as intravenous immunoglobulins or immunosuppressive drugs such as mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide or rituximab should be started. Unfortunately, sequelae-mostly hearing loss- remain frequent in these young patients.

Susac syndrome complicating a SARS-CoV-2 infection.

In 2020 the world was captivated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Current scientific evidence suggests an interaction of SARS-CoV-2 and the human immune system. Multiple cases were reported of patients with COVID-19 presenting with encephalopathy, confusion or agitation, stroke, and other neurologic symptoms. We present a case of a 40-year-old man diagnosed with Susac syndrome after COVID-19, presenting with acute sensorineural hearing loss, encephalopathy, a splenial "snowball-like" lesion, and branch retinal artery occlusions with distal arterial wall hyperintensity. Although the pathophysiology of Susac syndrome remains unclear, this case is in line with the ongoing debate about the influence of SARS-CoV-2 on the human immune system. Corticosteroid treatment was initiated, followed by two treatments with rituximab, with clinical improvement of the symptomatology. Maintenance treatment currently consists of mycophenolic acid (MPA). Future research will need to focus on the underlying mechanisms for COVID-19-associated (autoimmune) complications.

Bipolar disorder and Susac syndrome: a case report.

Susac-syndrome is a rare autoimmune disease that manifests with mood alterations in up to 15% of cases and is usually treated with corticosteroids. We present the case of a 41-year-old woman with a first manic episode and history of Susac-syndrome, secondary Cushing's syndrome after receiving high doses of corticosteroids and a previous depressive episode. Differentiating between primary and secondary mania is difficult, as people with bipolar disorder are prone to multiple psychiatric and nonpsychiatric comorbidities, in this case, the differential diagnosis included secondary mania, corticoid-induced manic episode and primary bipolar disorder. Upon admission, corticosteroid treatment was suspended, and the patient was started on lithium and risperidone. Secondary causes of mania were discarded and, assessing temporal and dosage criteria, it was deemed unlikely that the present episode was corticosteroid-induced. One-year outpatient follow-up pointed towards a primary bipolar type I disorder, as a separate entity from her Susac-syndrome. Corticosteroid use or abrupt withdrawal pose an underestimated risk of inducing depressive or manic symptoms, which may unmask affective disorders in susceptible individuals. Many medical conditions share CNS involvement and/or high-dose/prolonged corticosteroid treatment. In such cases, psychiatric manifestations such as mania or depression should be regarded as secondary and studied to determine the existence of medical complications before considering primary psychiatric conditions.